Communities and sellers.

tumblr_inline_mlaiu3hvfk1qz4rgpOne of these days I was visiting a Brazilian headphone community at Facebook when someone asked if his motherboard was compatible with a pair of headphones and if he needed a external DAC.
Now, this is normal on that community thus I went and read some of the replies until my eyes gazed at so much bullshit that I had to reply to the apparent intelligent user who wrote it.

His reply to the question was something along the lines of telling the person to change the power cord of the PSU and also change the SATA cable for a special audio one, he followed all of this bullshit by giving a link to a very known Brazilian audiophile community that has some really nice members but also a lot of pseudo-science bullshit. Sadly this link was of the last type.

My reply was simple, all elements inside a computer case are made to tolerate a lot of interference, if that wasn’t the case CPUs would not process data, power cables are important for their amperage and will not change the audio or affect the DACs of the motherboard. SATA cables are made for data not audio, and adhere to specifications which are on paper.

Things went down hill from there, after the guy laughed at my reply I dismissed him as the typical audiophile which believes in voodoo and went my way.
That was until someone in the group told me he was a seller of audiophile gear, after a fast Google search I found his site and BEHOLD, he sold very expensive audiophile cables, with prices high enough for me to raise my eyebrow.

I was looking at a snake oil seller, just my luck. Everybody knows I love them!
I went back and told everyone that I didn’t know the guy was a seller and that I would have not interact with him had I known it beforehand. I avoid this type of people like the plague because they go against everything the audiophile hobby represents.
Anyway, another group member called him out as a charlatan and the seller actually left the community after that.
I must admit I had a little fun with his departure comment and shown him the way out, just like a good internet gentleman. Maybe I was a bit out of line but I hate snake oil sellers.
To be sincere the guy could have stayed because nobody would have cared anyway.

Now I’m sure this was not the last time a seller tried to sneak in to a community to guide future costumers. A nudge there, a push right or left and voila new primed costumer in the horizon.
I believe people who sell or are related to manufacture companies should always disclose where they work before interacting in a community.
In this case the seller could have put a visible link to his site on his Facebook profile but he didn’t do it. Clearly the idea is to sweet talk less informed people in to believing bullshit.

This is another fine example why one should be careful with reviews, opinion makers and hype. Bullshit is just around the corner and it will jump at you when you least expect it.

About audiophile cables…again.

tumblr_inline_nsh3t9mwhz1rp0pu7_540
Photo By Tom Cronin (Flickr: One hell of a mess…) [CC BY-SA 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
helmuthsposts in a way I agree these kind of tests are stupid, mostly because they are done to discredit and make fun of all audiophiles. (Well, in this test at least the journalist was careful to point that some audiophiles do not share the opinion that audiophile network cables change the sound)
In fact besides guitar players I don’t actually know more people who “fight” over the importance of cabling in audio, and even guitar players have their reasons to fight about cables mostly because cable length and impedance can change their sound.

Its my opinion that audiophile cable companies should be legally forbidden of claiming improvements in their cables without proper scientific tests made by companies like

Bureau Veritas. Any improvement claim without proper tests should be considered false advertising and dealt in a swift manner by the authorities. Yes, I’m that tired of the cable wars…

I have some things I don’t enjoy about audiophile cable companies.
I don’t like the marketing BS some of them use to lure audiophiles and also the massive lobby behind their advertising in some magazines and audiophile websites.
Journalists/reviewers are human and they have bills to pay. So yes, they will hear differences in the cables and they are always good differences, someone point me to a bad audiophile cable review made by a serious site, please!
Seriously last time I paused my ad-blocker I was amazed by the sheer volume of cable ads in audiophile sites. Its like a visual virus!
Only our hobby has this aggressive behavior by audiophile cable makers, most cable makers don’t really need so much visual garbage to sell their stuff.

I’m always highly suspicious of reviewers that claim a HUGE difference when they change a cable, be it a loudspeaker, signal, data or even a power cable.
I’m sure they actually believe in what they are writing but I don’t have the need to believe in them because I make my own cables, plus most of them don’t objectively test their cables. Seriously a capacitance, resistance meter isn’t that expensive or hard to learn to use! Some network players are harder to use.

I respect their opinions if they respect mine, for me there are far more important things in audio than pieces of wire interconnecting gear.
Note that I believe in quality cabling but always supported by objective tests, plus people are free to spend their money the way they enjoy it most.
If someone whats to spend 10K in a cable sure go ahead the economy will be happy.

By the way I know only one man that actually tries to explain objectively why cables make a difference, that man is Mr. Roger Skoff (Former XLO cables owner), I respect him a lot but not always agree with him. With that said everyone is free to have their opinion but always in a civil manner specially in public communities. Mr. Skoff suffers a lot of bashing online and I don’t agree with that. Community made bashing is wrong and rude…
Before someone accuses me of having a double standard, Mr.Skoff actually always says he was and still is in a way connected to XLO so its no secret, some other reviewers are not so open about their relationship with audiophile cable brands.

My biased review on subjective cable reviewers.

I have a little evil rule I often follow, if a site reviews audio cables in a subjective way I’ll drop it from my serious list of sites.  

This means I’ll take anything on that site with suspicion, specially reviews.
I don’t have anything against sites that actually try to objectively measure an audio cable but besides Archimago’s blog I don’t know anyone who does it, to be completely sincere.

I believe subjective cable reviewers actually believe in all that they write most of the time, unless the cable in question is advertised on their site. If they make money from the cable brand they are reviewing doesn’t matter how serious they say they are, they’ll be biased and often will try to protect their income.
It hurts me to write such a thing but it’s true, I usually lurk around websites and watch with amazement reviewers or friends of reviewers defending a sponsor.
Anyone who does that is not a pro in my book, amateurs I can forgive because they don’t make money, but so called professionals should NOT endorse such behavior.

So I’m biased against subjective cable reviewers , you bet I am!
One of my favorite audiophile writers whom I shall not name here was the owner of a audiophile cable company, now this man knows his cables and tries to debunk some like me who say audio cables make no difference after a certain point in price/quality.
The difference is that this writer actually tries to explain objectively why cables might sound different and he isn’t reviewing for a sponsor or possible future sponsor.

A owner of a site I shall not name here wrote that most cable reviewers would need to make expensive investments in testing gear and education so they could make objective reviews, he also wrote that readers would need some education to understand those reviews.

Now I respect his opinion but I do not agree with him. Pros should have their own testing tools, that’s why they are pros and not amateurs. If they don’t have money they should try to find a lab that makes the measurements for them. As for education, a professional reviewer should know what he reviews and have at least some education do understand basic measurements, after all amateurs do it all the time.
This brings me to the last point, audiophiles love their hobby and will try to educate themselves if they can achieve better audio reproduction.

I believe it’s easier to write subjective reviews, spit some unusual words almost like a wine taster and voila you got a subjective cable review!
If that’s the case I understand those reviewers but that’s is being lazy in my book. 
I care less and less about the inner fights of the hobby but I believe we must be serious about it and with each other.